From reading through the “Court Order” and finding these instances of defense attorney misconduct I have to conclude the three paragraphs noted above caused the Judge to stop the jury selection on the spot, ruled the entire jury pool “tainted” and scheduled a brand new trial with a brand new jury pool, perhaps just moments after the Bailiff took us outside, dismissed us from jury duty and told us we could go.
Looking back, I have to speculate that they wanted me out of there as I was bound to eventually write these articles. But, Hey, I did anyway. And I plan on doing some spot Court Watching on this new trial once it gets underway. Like I have said before, this is likely to be the Trial of the Century at the Cleveland County Courthouse. And now I know exactly what to watch for. A multi-million dollar judgement in favor of the Teddy family. Otherwise, why would the Insurance lawyers want me out of there so desperately? And the Teddy attorneys being satisfied with me being fair and willing to listen to the evidence before making a final verdict. What more can a fair jury provide than that? However, in my own experience, lawyers on the losing side don’t want fair juries. They want juries they can flim-flam to get verdicts that go their way. No matter where the truth lies. I am sure that is what happened in this first trial. I am glad if I had any part in making sure an “unfair” and “tainted” jury was not selected and an “unfair” trial was avoided.
I also suspect I will never be called for jury duty again.
Stay tuned for the news of this new trial. It ain’t over ’til it’s over!
[gview file=”https://citizensforgoodgovernment.org/online/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Teddy-Trial-Motions-regarding-lawyers-10-pagessm.pdf”]
[gview file=”https://citizensforgoodgovernment.org/online/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Complaint-Teddy-Trial.pdf”]
